I don't know if you ever get this problem here at blogspot or not, but don't you just hate it when you join an
article submission diretory,
blog host, or similar service where you can post articles, share articles, rant about, create minisites/blog, and then create a fabulous site, article, or whatever it is on your mind only to have have it rejected for some odd reason, such as "spam" or some other violation? For example, maybe you have taken up network marketing and decide to offer detailed information about the network marketing firm you are a part of (such as
Global Domains International) and post it say on your blog, and then several months later, some jerk decides to flag your post as spam. Well, I've been having that problem at Squidoo lately. Squidoo is a article submission/blog host directory similar to hub pages, where you can create your own minisites called Squidoo Lenses (which functions almost like a websit within a website). Anyways, I created several lenses myself, including several lenses reviewing some of the Xbox 360 games I've played, one lens offering information about my internet marketing stuff (such as a lens offering a detailed review about GDI, one of the network marketing firms I use), as well as an "about me page". Well, today, the moderators at squidoo decided to get rid of my lens and claimed I violated their terms of service. That was really frustrating. Ironically, that lens was up for over two years now and it never reieved any complaints or anything (by the way, some of the information on the lens is out of date as I've been so busy with other stuff, such as adding more content to this blog and several other blogs i have) and yet 2 years later, they send me this message about the lens:
"Dear Squidoo Lensmaster: This is a notification that the following Squidoo lenses are in violation of our Terms of Service and have been unpublished. http://www.squidoo.com/ryansintroduction ==WHY WERE THESE LENSES UNPUBLISHED?== We run regular and periodic reviews of lenses to enforce our policies, including (but not limited to) acting against spam content, locking lenses on topics we can't support, lenses that exist solely to promote an affiliate program, and most recently we have also increased our systematic intolerance of aggressively duplicated (unoriginal) content and plagiarism. Here are 4 resources you should read about our content policies on Squidoo. These links go into detail about several reasons that lenses get unpublished. 1. The Squidoo Originality Pact: http://www.squidoo.com/originalitypact2. What Is Unoriginal, Duplicated Content? http://www.squidoo.com/original-vs-duplicate-content3. SquidDon't topics we don't allow on Squidoo: http://www.squidoo.com/squiddont4. Overly promotional lenses: http://www.squidoo.com/outboundlinklimit ==NOW WHAT?== The above lenses have been unpublished in order to give you a chance to review the content and save it to take elsewhere. An unpublished lens is no longer live or viewable on the web, and will be removed from search engine indexes. The lens Workshop is still available to you for 30 days so that you can login and access the content and export it to your own computer. Any unpaid royalties the lenses might have earned before today will be donated to charity. You can read more about your unpublished lenses here: http://www.squidoo.com/locked We'd love to help you avoid the frustration of publishing a lens that gets unpublished, and hope the above guidelines help you make decisions about what kinds of lenses are worth your time in the future. Here are examples of good, original lenses that satisfy our content guidelines:å http://blogs.squidoo.com/lensoftheday Please note that repeated violations going forward will result in the suspension of your entire Squidoo account. We encourage you to refamiliarize yourself with the policies posted above before creating a new lens. Thanks for reading. The Squidoo Content TeamSquidoo.com This email was sent from a notification-only, official Squidoo email address that does not accept reply emails. Please do not reply to this message."
That message had me scratching my head. By the way, you can view a cached version of the lens that was unpublished at
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:MXsgVVqOXHgJ:www.squidoo.com/ryansintroduction+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=encrypted.google.com (though that might update after a while) and tell me what you think about the lens and why they might have unpublished it (though I suppose it might have something to do with the part where I was ranting about marketing related stuff). By the way, some of the info on the lens are out of date. First off, the website I talked about (
http://www.ryansjones.com/) is no more and in its place, I have an ebook store website at
http://www.snohomish-ebook-store.net/ as well as an Xbox 360 fan site at
http://www.xboxfreak.ws/. Also I am actually 28 years old now (not 25). Anyways, the lens was locked and unpublished (the version above is a cached version on google). By the way, this was not the first time that happened to me. First it happened to a lens I made that offered a detailed review about
GDI (a network marketing firm / web hosting service I use) and about a year later, apparently they did not like it and took it down (I tried to appeal it too unsuccessfully), and later on I had another lens that offered a general profile about my online stuff.
Anyways, after today, it became obvious to me that squidoo is not going to be compatible with my internet marketing efforts (especially if they are just going to delete my lenses without any warning or anything about a year or so down the road), and so I terminated my account there. In Squidoo's place, most articles I write will go either on my blogs or I will post them on
Hub Pages. A nice thing about
hub pages is that they are much more straight forward about their policies and I've haven't had any problems with the articles I have posted there as I have with Squidoo. I am sorry if I am sounding harsh towards Squidoo, but you know, it's their loss and I rather post articles at sites that are going to help my cause instead of hindering it.
Here are some advice for Squiddo if you don't want other people deleting their accounts:
1) Make your policies more straight forward. For example in the Squid Don't folder, make detailed list on topics you are not supposed to write about. For example, if you don't want lenses about internet marketing related stuff, you should make that clear.
2) Warn lensmasters if their lenses are violating your policies (especially ones that have been around for a while). You realise that one can violate a rule or policy unknowingly (especially if there are lot of rules to follow and whenever there are grey areas). For example, if my lens was deleted because of a link you don't like (such as a referral link), you could have asked me to get rid of it and I would have. If you just take down one's lens or suspend one's account with no explanation, they will just go to another service (such as Instant Blog Subscribers).
3) Making high quality articles and lenses can be tricky, especially for newbies like myself, so helping people to improve their suff can help.
4) Where people can flag articles, there should be a way for one to challenge the flags (especially in an age where there are internet trolls and other types of flaggers lurking around looking for things to flag). Craigslist is an example of this, where you try to post a catchy ad about your business or services and a few hours later, some jerks decide to flag your ad (last time it happened to me, I posted an ad asking for video submissions for my
husky videos blog).
Anyways, that is the update and I will start looking for a new article submission directory to submit my articles too, but I think I am going to take a break from
Squidoo for now.
By the way, have any of you had problems with Squidoo? If so, feel free to share them here.